PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAPX vs. AMAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAPX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's 16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAPX has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.61% annualized return.


AMAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
2.22%

AMAGX

1D
0.98%
1M
6.03%
YTD
16.31%
6M
15.18%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
17.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
0.26%5.98%3.77%2.09%-5.27%0.49%5.35%6.61%0.08%2.56%
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
16.31%17.62%15.73%25.67%-19.49%31.51%32.93%33.09%2.47%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAPX and AMAGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.09

The correlation between AMAPX and AMAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAPX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAPX
AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAGX
AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAPXAMAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

2.36

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

3.23

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.41

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.41

-1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.78

15.20

-8.42

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the AMAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAPX and AMAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAPXAMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.36

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.77

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.96

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.68

+0.42

Drawdowns

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAPX drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAPX and AMAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAPXAMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-57.64%

+49.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-11.04%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.74%

-21.45%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.75%

-28.09%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.75%

-28.09%

+20.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-10.28%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.48%

-1.71%

Volatility

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) is 1.50%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that AMAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAPXAMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

4.94%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

12.93%

-10.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20%

16.11%

-13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

18.40%

-16.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.01%

18.42%

-16.41%

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAPX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison

AMAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
3.66%3.52%3.15%2.25%1.30%1.55%1.95%2.45%2.62%2.14%2.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAPX and AMAGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAGX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to AMAPX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAPX dropped -7.75% vs AMAGX's -57.64%.

AMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAPX and AMAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer