PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSEX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSEX achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 8.43% return.


PFSEX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.36%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.89%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

VMVFX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.52%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.94%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
10.53%17.66%15.07%19.04%-17.22%17.81%11.91%22.25%-15.09%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
8.43%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSEX and VMVFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between PFSEX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSEX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSEX
PFSEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PFSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSEXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.08

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

8.13

+3.26

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSEX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSEXVMVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.01

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.82

-0.30

Drawdowns

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSEX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum VMVFX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSEX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSEXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-33.09%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-6.27%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-7.96%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-13.02%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-2.83%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.60%

+0.64%

Volatility

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund (PFSEX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that PFSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSEXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

1.94%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

5.17%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

6.81%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

10.76%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

12.48%

+5.98%

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSEX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

PFSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, more than VMVFX's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFSEX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Aggressive Strategy Fund
15.71%17.36%1.71%0.00%6.35%5.13%0.00%0.00%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.20%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSEX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSEX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to VMVFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSEX dropped -33.76% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

PFSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSEX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer