PFRL vs. SLNZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ).

PFRL and SLNZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFRL is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on May 17, 2022. SLNZ is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Jun 28, 2013.

Performance

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	-0.51%	6.25%	0.58%
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF	-0.97%	5.21%	0.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than SLNZ's -0.97% return.

PFRL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 5.35%
• 3Y*: 8.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLNZ

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: -0.97%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SLNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

PFRL

PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF

SLNZ

TCW Senior Loan ETF

Return for Risk

PFRL vs. SLNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFRL

PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 48
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SLNZ

SLNZ Risk / Return Rank: 35
SLNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SLNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SLNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SLNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SLNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFRL	SLNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	0.68	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	0.94	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.13	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	1.17	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	3.48	+2.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the SLNZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and SLNZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFRL	SLNZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	0.68	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.57	0.87	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between PFRL and SLNZ is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Dividend Comparison

PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than SLNZ's 7.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	7.83%	7.34%	8.96%	9.84%	3.55%
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF	7.66%	7.39%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, which is greater than SLNZ's maximum drawdown of -2.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and SLNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFRL	SLNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-2.57%	-6.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-2.57%	-5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.73%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-0.46%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.86%	0.00%

Volatility

PFRL vs. SLNZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.74%, while TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFRL	SLNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	1.97%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.61%	3.82%	-2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.53%	4.72%	+3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.96%	4.32%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	4.32%	+0.64%