PFOE vs. RPG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PFOE is actively managed, while RPG is passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

PFOE vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFOE achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 19.96% return.

PFOE

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -3.20%
• 6M: -10.62%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RPG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -9.74%
• 6M: 14.71%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 13.40%
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	$315.87K	$800.41K	$1.21M
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	$39.18M	$42.11M	$41.32M

PFOE vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	-9.13%	-1.29%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	19.96%	-1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PFOE and RPG is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

PFOE vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFOE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 35
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFOE vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFOE	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.81	—

Drawdowns

PFOE vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFOE	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-53.27%	+35.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.94%	-12.37%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-8.82%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFOE	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	24.88%	-6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	24.40%	-5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.46%	23.17%	-4.71%

PFOE vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFOE vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFOE and RPG in my portfolio?

PFOE and RPG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFOE or RPG?

On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFOE or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PFOE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFOE or RPG?

PFOE has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

What is the main difference between PFOE and RPG?

They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.35% for RPG.