PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFO vs. FTCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFO vs. FTCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund (PFO) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FTCVX's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PFO has underperformed FTCVX with an annualized return of 3.96%, while FTCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.


PFO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-1.72%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
3.96%
ALL TIME*
5.16%

FTCVX

1D
3.00%
1M
-3.65%
6M
8.34%
YTD
13.75%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$273.61K$212.78K$249.77K

PFO vs. FTCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFO
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund
0.83%12.47%21.42%-0.59%-27.25%3.57%14.06%24.93%-4.20%13.98%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
13.75%17.67%7.70%12.42%-15.82%9.35%41.70%27.83%-1.88%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PFO and FTCVX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFO vs. FTCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFO
PFO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCVX
FTCVX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FTCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFO vs. FTCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund (PFO) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFOFTCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.96

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

7.68

-5.52

PFO vs. FTCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FTCVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFO and FTCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFO vs. FTCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFO drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, which is greater than FTCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFO and FTCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFOFTCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.36%

-25.10%

-52.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-11.74%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.64%

-18.91%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-24.45%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.97%

-25.10%

-23.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-9.09%

+5.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-5.84%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.99%

-0.22%

Volatility

PFO vs. FTCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund (PFO) is 1.91%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that PFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFOFTCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

6.05%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.29%

13.97%

-8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

17.00%

-9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

13.93%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

13.87%

+7.91%

PFO vs. FTCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFO has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFO vs. FTCVX - Dividend Comparison

PFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, less than FTCVX's 8.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
8.82%10.89%1.66%3.03%3.18%20.07%10.32%2.74%9.06%3.78%4.32%9.73%
PFO
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund
7.39%6.84%6.75%7.18%8.73%6.49%6.10%6.31%7.55%7.25%8.03%8.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFO and FTCVX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCVX has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to PFO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFO dropped -77.36% vs FTCVX's -25.10%.

FTCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFO and FTCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer