PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLD vs. QPFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFLD vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PFLD

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.69%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*

QPFF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFLD vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


PFLD vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFLD
QPFF

Utilities

100.0%
5.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

51.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.2%

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

PFLD
100.0%
QPFF
5.5%

Basic Materials

PFLD

-

QPFF
0.3%

Communication Services

PFLD

-

QPFF
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PFLD

-

QPFF
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

PFLD

-

QPFF

-

Energy

PFLD

-

QPFF

-

Financial Services

PFLD

-

QPFF
51.6%

Healthcare

PFLD

-

QPFF

-

Industrials

PFLD

-

QPFF
1.2%

Real Estate

PFLD

-

QPFF
4.1%

Technology

PFLD

-

QPFF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFLD vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QPFF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLDQPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

PFLD vs. QPFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLDQPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

Drawdowns

PFLD vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and QPFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLDQPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

0.00%

-33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

0.00%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

Volatility

PFLD vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLDQPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

0.00%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

0.00%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.38%

0.00%

+13.38%

PFLD vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFLD vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
5.60%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%
QPFF
American Century Quality Preferred ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.

PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.

They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 0.33% for QPFF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFLD and QPFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer