PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFLD vs. PRFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFLD vs. PRFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFLD vs. PRFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFLD achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than PRFD's -0.68% return.


PFLD

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.97%
1Y
1.72%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*

PRFD

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFLD vs. PRFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFD's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFLD vs. PRFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFLD
PFLD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PFLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFD
PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFLD vs. PRFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLDPRFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

1.73

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

2.24

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.82

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.09

6.38

-5.29

PFLD vs. PRFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PRFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFLD and PRFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLDPRFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.73

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.23

-1.09

Correlation

The correlation between PFLD and PRFD is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PFLD vs. PRFD - Dividend Comparison

PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than PRFD's 5.74% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A
6.05%6.52%7.09%7.09%5.76%4.52%4.79%0.82%
PRFD
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.74%5.63%5.53%5.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFLD vs. PRFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than PRFD's maximum drawdown of -11.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and PRFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLDPRFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-11.93%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-3.28%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.65%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-2.30%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.94%

+0.18%

Volatility

PFLD vs. PRFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) is 1.14%, while PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that PFLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFLDPRFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.64%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

2.42%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.28%

3.55%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

4.94%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.55%

4.94%

+8.61%