PFLD vs. IPPP
PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) and IPPP (Preferred-Plus ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFLD is passively managed, while IPPP is actively managed. PFLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for IPPP.
Performance
PFLD vs. IPPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
IPPP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD vs. IPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 1.39% |
IPPP Preferred-Plus ETF | 0.00% |
PFLD vs. IPPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFLD
IPPP
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
PFLD
IPPP
Basic Materials
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Communication Services
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Consumer Defensive
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Energy
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Financial Services
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Healthcare
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Industrials
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Real Estate
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Technology
PFLD
-
IPPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFLD vs. IPPP — Risk / Return Rank
PFLD
IPPP
PFLD vs. IPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) and Preferred-Plus ETF (IPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFLD | IPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFLD | IPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PFLD vs. IPPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFLD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than IPPP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFLD and IPPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFLD | IPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | 0.00% | -33.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | 0.00% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
PFLD vs. IPPP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFLD | IPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 0.00% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 0.00% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 0.00% | +13.38% |
PFLD vs. IPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IPPP's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFLD vs. IPPP - Dividend Comparison
PFLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, while IPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPPP Preferred-Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for IPPP.
PFLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.00% for IPPP.
They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFLD and 1.27% for IPPP.
Find the right allocation for PFLD and IPPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer