PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFL vs. PTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFL vs. PTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than PTY's -3.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PFL has underperformed PTY with an annualized return of 7.69%, while PTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.


PFL

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-4.64%
6M
-3.84%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
7.69%

PTY

1D
0.60%
1M
0.76%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-2.62%
1Y
-3.79%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFL vs. PTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFL
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
-4.64%13.03%11.51%17.29%-17.92%4.62%7.11%19.65%2.06%21.26%
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
-3.45%-0.51%19.87%22.56%-18.71%0.40%3.24%35.36%2.49%26.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PFL and PTY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2003

0.43

The correlation between PFL and PTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFL vs. PTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFL
PFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PTY
PTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFL vs. PTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFLPTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.94

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.25

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

-0.47

+1.62

PFL vs. PTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the PTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFL and PTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFL vs. PTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than PTY's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and PTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLPTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.97%

-60.86%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-15.44%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.21%

-16.04%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-41.38%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.40%

-46.55%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-12.37%

+5.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-8.62%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

8.11%

-5.51%

Volatility

PFL vs. PTY - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) at 1.99%. This indicates that PFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLPTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

1.99%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

7.66%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.21%

10.92%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

17.27%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

21.19%

-2.84%

Dividends

PFL vs. PTY - Dividend Comparison

PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than PTY's 12.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFL
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
12.90%11.59%11.66%11.57%12.04%9.53%9.44%9.11%9.94%9.25%10.22%11.09%
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
12.12%11.05%9.92%10.77%13.12%9.16%8.74%8.37%10.63%9.48%12.09%11.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFL and PTY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFL has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to PTY (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFL dropped -77.97% vs PTY's -60.86%.

PFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFL and PTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer