PFL vs. KIO
PFL (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund) and KIO (KKR Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PFL returned 7.87%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for KIO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFL vs. KIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than KIO's 2.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFL having a 7.87% annualized return and KIO not far ahead at 7.92%.
PFL
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
KIO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.92%
PFL vs. KIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | -4.28% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -17.92% | 4.62% | 7.11% | 19.65% | 2.06% | 21.26% |
KIO KKR Income Opportunities Fund | 2.77% | -2.49% | 18.45% | 31.53% | -28.25% | 26.82% | 2.04% | 21.92% | -2.53% | 9.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL and KIO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2013 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL vs. KIO — Risk / Return Rank
PFL
KIO
PFL vs. KIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFL | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 0.94 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFL | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.29 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.39 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PFL vs. KIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than KIO's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and KIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -43.87% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -11.01% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.21% | -22.85% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -31.87% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.40% | -43.87% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -8.51% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -8.08% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 5.00% | -2.76% |
Volatility
PFL vs. KIO - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) at 2.55%. This indicates that PFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFL | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.55% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 7.70% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.00% | 9.96% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 13.18% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 16.39% | +1.95% |
Dividends
PFL vs. KIO - Dividend Comparison
PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, less than KIO's 12.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIO KKR Income Opportunities Fund | 12.91% | 12.58% | 10.90% | 11.32% | 11.44% | 7.45% | 10.12% | 9.51% | 10.53% | 9.66% | 9.92% | 10.81% |
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | 12.72% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFL and KIO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFL has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to KIO (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFL dropped -77.97% vs KIO's -43.87%.
KIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFL and KIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer