PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFL vs. JMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFL vs. JMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than JMM's -2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PFL has outperformed JMM with an annualized return of 7.87%, while JMM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.


PFL

1D
-1.29%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
7.87%

JMM

1D
-1.55%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-2.80%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
-1.87%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFL vs. JMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFL
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
-4.28%13.03%11.51%17.29%-17.92%4.62%7.11%19.65%2.06%21.26%
JMM
Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund
-2.80%5.61%8.15%6.57%-17.95%10.53%1.77%13.56%-5.37%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PFL and JMM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFL vs. JMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFL
PFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

JMM
JMM Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
JMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
JMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFL vs. JMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFLJMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

-0.23

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

-0.48

+1.88

PFL vs. JMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the JMM Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFL and JMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFLJMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

-0.16

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.21

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.17

+0.12

Drawdowns

PFL vs. JMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than JMM's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and JMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFLJMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.97%

-48.15%

-29.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-8.28%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.21%

-9.92%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-24.19%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.40%

-26.48%

-21.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.11%

-7.69%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-14.10%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.89%

-1.65%

Volatility

PFL vs. JMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) is 2.88%, while Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that PFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFLJMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.20%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

8.07%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.00%

11.94%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

13.39%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

13.91%

+4.43%

Dividends

PFL vs. JMM - Dividend Comparison

PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than JMM's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMM
Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund
6.07%5.76%5.48%5.58%6.13%4.60%4.49%4.86%5.34%5.63%6.19%6.76%
PFL
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
12.72%11.59%11.66%11.57%12.04%9.53%9.44%9.11%9.94%9.25%10.22%11.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFL and JMM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMM has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to PFL (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFL dropped -77.97% vs JMM's -48.15%.

PFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFL and JMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer