PFL vs. JMM
PFL (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund) and JMM (Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PFL returned 7.87%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for JMM. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFL vs. JMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFL achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than JMM's -2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PFL has outperformed JMM with an annualized return of 7.87%, while JMM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.
PFL
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
JMM
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- -1.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
PFL vs. JMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | -4.28% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -17.92% | 4.62% | 7.11% | 19.65% | 2.06% | 21.26% |
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | -2.80% | 5.61% | 8.15% | 6.57% | -17.95% | 10.53% | 1.77% | 13.56% | -5.37% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL and JMM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2003 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL vs. JMM — Risk / Return Rank
PFL
JMM
PFL vs. JMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) and Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFL | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.23 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | -0.48 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFL | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | -0.16 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.05 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.21 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
PFL vs. JMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFL drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than JMM's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL and JMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -48.15% | -29.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -8.28% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.21% | -9.92% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -24.19% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.40% | -26.48% | -21.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -7.69% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -14.10% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.89% | -1.65% |
Volatility
PFL vs. JMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) is 2.88%, while Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that PFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFL | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 3.20% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.85% | 8.07% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.00% | 11.94% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 13.39% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 13.91% | +4.43% |
Dividends
PFL vs. JMM - Dividend Comparison
PFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than JMM's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | 6.07% | 5.76% | 5.48% | 5.58% | 6.13% | 4.60% | 4.49% | 4.86% | 5.34% | 5.63% | 6.19% | 6.76% |
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | 12.72% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFL and JMM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMM has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to PFL (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFL dropped -77.97% vs JMM's -48.15%.
PFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFL and JMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer