PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFJDX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund (PFJDX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFJDX achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.96% return.


PFJDX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.75%
YTD
6.88%
6M
7.02%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*

TPDAX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.99%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFJDX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund
6.88%13.15%9.96%12.71%-15.77%11.10%8.40%16.33%-11.06%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.96%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PFJDX and TPDAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PFJDX and TPDAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFJDX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFJDX
PFJDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PFJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PFJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund (PFJDX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFJDXTPDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.34

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

11.51

-0.75

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFJDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFJDX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFJDXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.28

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.85

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFJDX drawdown since its inception was -25.97%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFJDX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFJDXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.97%

-22.29%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-7.58%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.38%

-7.58%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-17.58%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.53%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-4.92%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.20%

-0.55%

Volatility

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund (PFJDX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFJDXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.91%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

9.47%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

11.17%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

10.18%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

9.90%

+2.78%

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFJDX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFJDX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

PFJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than TPDAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PFJDX
PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund
5.57%5.96%1.19%0.52%8.75%6.40%0.35%0.45%0.04%0.00%0.00%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.72%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFJDX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to PFJDX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFJDX dropped -25.97% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFJDX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer