PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIX vs. SHUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIX vs. SHUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIX achieves a -6.98% return, which is significantly lower than SHUS's 8.73% return.


PFIX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-11.02%
YTD
-6.98%
6M
-6.81%
1Y
-12.36%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*

SHUS

1D
0.13%
1M
0.74%
YTD
8.73%
6M
8.13%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIX vs. SHUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
-6.98%0.42%26.80%
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
8.73%10.89%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIX and SHUS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024

-0.18

The correlation between PFIX and SHUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIX vs. SHUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SHUS
SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIX vs. SHUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFIXSHUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.29

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

2.43

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

8.63

-9.37

PFIX vs. SHUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the SHUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIX and SHUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFIX vs. SHUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than SHUS's maximum drawdown of -14.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIX and SHUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIXSHUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-14.09%

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.64%

-6.95%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.31%

-1.33%

-21.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-2.59%

-14.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.70%

1.96%

+14.74%

Volatility

PFIX vs. SHUS - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) at 3.18%. This indicates that PFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIXSHUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

3.18%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

7.37%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.19%

10.17%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.46%

12.60%

+25.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.23%

12.60%

+25.63%

PFIX vs. SHUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SHUS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFIX vs. SHUS - Dividend Comparison

PFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, more than SHUS's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
10.44%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
1.26%1.37%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIX and SHUS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to SHUS (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIX dropped -36.17% vs SHUS's -14.09%.

On 1-year performance, SHUS leads with 16.83% vs -12.36% for PFIX. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SHUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SHUS has performed better with a 16.83% return vs -12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SHUS.

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 10.44%, compared with 1.26% for SHUS.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Syntax Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PFIX and 0.65% for SHUS.

SHUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIX and SHUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer