PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIX vs. QTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFIX vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFIX vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
-2.90%0.42%35.94%5.67%92.05%-6.31%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
-7.25%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -7.25% return.


PFIX

1D
-3.95%
1M
11.53%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
10Y*

QTR

1D
1.82%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-7.25%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFIX vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFIX vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIX vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIXQTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

1.04

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

1.56

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.36

-1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.17

4.83

-4.67

PFIX vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIX and QTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIXQTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

1.04

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.39

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between PFIX and QTR is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PFIX vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

PFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, less than QTR's 20.24% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
10.17%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
20.24%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%

Drawdowns

PFIX vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than QTR's maximum drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIX and QTR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIXQTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-31.72%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.22%

-12.29%

-15.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.94%

-10.69%

-9.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-9.10%

-7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.44%

3.45%

+13.99%

Volatility

PFIX vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) at 4.90%. This indicates that PFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFIXQTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

4.90%

+8.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

10.80%

+9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

16.44%

+18.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.75%

18.16%

+20.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.75%

18.16%

+20.59%