PFIG vs. MYCF
PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and MYCF (State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PFIG is passively managed, while MYCF is actively managed. Over the past year, PFIG returned 4.83% vs 4.60% for MYCF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MYCF.
Performance
PFIG vs. MYCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than MYCF's 1.63% return.
PFIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
MYCF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIG vs. MYCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.19% | 7.87% | -1.88% |
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.63% | 5.12% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFIG and MYCF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between PFIG and MYCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFIG vs. MYCF — Risk / Return Rank
PFIG
MYCF
PFIG vs. MYCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFIG | MYCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 3.22 | -1.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 38.53 | -36.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 164.09 | -155.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFIG | MYCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 6.98 | -5.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 4.12 | -3.60 |
Drawdowns
PFIG vs. MYCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than MYCF's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and MYCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFIG | MYCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -0.60% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -0.12% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -0.03% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.03% | +0.56% |
Volatility
PFIG vs. MYCF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) at 0.15%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFIG | MYCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.15% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 0.43% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 0.66% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 1.09% | +3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 1.09% | +4.15% |
PFIG vs. MYCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MYCF's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PFIG vs. MYCF - Dividend Comparison
PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, which matches MYCF's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.50% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.15% | 4.12% | 3.54% | 2.58% | 3.34% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFIG and MYCF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIG has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to MYCF (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs MYCF's -0.60%.
On 1-year performance, PFIG leads with 4.83% vs 4.60% for MYCF. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PFIG has performed better with a 4.83% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.
PFIG and MYCF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.40%.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.15% for MYCF.
MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.98 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFIG and MYCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer