MYCF vs. INVG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MYCF (State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCF returned 4.41% vs 5.28% for INVG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYCF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for INVG.

Performance

MYCF vs. INVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MYCF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than INVG's 0.80% return.

MYCF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INVG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MYCF vs. INVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.82%	2.91%
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	0.80%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MYCF and INVG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

MYCF vs. INVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MYCF

MYCF Risk / Return Rank: 99
MYCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MYCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MYCF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MYCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MYCF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

INVG

INVG Risk / Return Rank: 34
INVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
INVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
INVG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
INVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
INVG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MYCF vs. INVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MYCF	INVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.00	1.19	+5.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	13.07	1.76	+11.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.26	1.21	+2.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	36.96	1.68	+35.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	160.36	5.36	+155.00

MYCF vs. INVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MYCF Sharpe Ratio is 7.00, which is higher than the INVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MYCF and INVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MYCF vs. INVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MYCF drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum INVG drawdown of -3.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCF and INVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MYCF	INVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-3.15%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-3.15%	+3.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.76%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.71%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.99%	-0.96%

Volatility

MYCF vs. INVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) is 0.14%, while GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that MYCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MYCF	INVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	1.26%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.40%	3.42%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63%	4.46%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.07%	4.46%	-3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.07%	4.46%	-3.39%

MYCF vs. INVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MYCF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INVG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MYCF vs. INVG - Dividend Comparison

MYCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than INVG's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF	4.67%	2.81%	0.00%
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.40%	4.50%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MYCF and INVG in my portfolio?

MYCF and INVG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MYCF or INVG?

INVG has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to MYCF (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCF dropped -0.60% vs INVG's -3.15%.

Which ETF is better, MYCF or INVG?

On 1-year performance, INVG leads with 5.28% vs 4.41% for MYCF. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MYCF or INVG?

Over the 1-year period, INVG has performed better with a 5.28% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MYCF or INVG?

MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for INVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MYCF or INVG?

INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.40% for MYCF.

What is the main difference between MYCF and INVG?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCF and 0.25% for INVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.00 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.