PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. IGHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than IGHG's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PFIG has underperformed IGHG with an annualized return of 2.48%, while IGHG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.76% annualized return.


PFIG

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.28%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
2.48%

IGHG

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.50%
YTD
2.05%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
4.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.07%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%9.69%-0.82%4.00%
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
2.05%5.65%9.20%11.58%-0.90%0.88%0.61%12.73%-3.96%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and IGHG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between PFIG and IGHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IGHG
IGHG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IGHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIGIGHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.60

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

12.74

-5.39

PFIG vs. IGHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the IGHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and IGHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIGIGHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.84

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.04

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.64

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and IGHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGIGHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-25.16%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-1.75%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

-3.74%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-8.75%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

-25.16%

+9.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.27%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.30%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.49%

+0.11%

Volatility

PFIG vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) at 0.69%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGIGHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.69%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

2.54%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

3.45%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

5.02%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

7.46%

-2.22%

PFIG vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFIG vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than IGHG's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
5.12%5.14%5.06%4.99%3.55%2.50%2.79%3.48%4.13%3.36%3.37%3.65%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.41%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIG and IGHG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIG has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to IGHG (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs IGHG's -25.16%.

On 10-year performance, IGHG leads with 4.76% vs 2.48% for PFIG. On fees, PFIG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, IGHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGHG has performed better with a 4.76% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.41% for PFIG.

PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and IGHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer