PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIG vs. IGBH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIG vs. IGBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than IGBH's 2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PFIG has underperformed IGBH with an annualized return of 2.44%, while IGBH has yielded a comparatively higher 5.04% annualized return.


PFIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.44%

IGBH

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.78%
YTD
2.31%
6M
3.18%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. IGBH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.19%7.87%3.13%6.93%-9.96%-1.43%7.72%9.69%-0.82%4.00%
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
2.31%7.90%7.80%12.12%-2.82%2.20%1.09%9.62%-4.54%9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and IGBH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2015

0.16

The correlation between PFIG and IGBH shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIG vs. IGBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG
PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IGBH
IGBH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. IGBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIGIGBHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

2.33

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

3.50

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.22

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.20

8.15

+0.05

PFIG vs. IGBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the IGBH Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and IGBH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIGIGBHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.33

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.86

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. IGBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum IGBH drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and IGBH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIGIGBHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-33.67%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-4.24%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.52%

-6.93%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-10.48%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

-33.67%

+18.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.19%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.67%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.15%

-0.56%

Volatility

PFIG vs. IGBH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) at 0.87%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIGIGBHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.87%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

3.14%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

4.05%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

6.13%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

9.20%

-3.96%

PFIG vs. IGBH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IGBH's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PFIG vs. IGBH - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than IGBH's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.66%6.23%6.88%7.32%3.84%2.71%2.39%3.40%5.56%2.87%2.62%1.12%
PFIG
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.15%4.12%3.54%2.58%3.34%2.81%2.92%2.88%2.54%2.58%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIG and IGBH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIG has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to IGBH (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs IGBH's -33.67%.

On 10-year performance, IGBH leads with 5.04% vs 2.44% for PFIG. On fees, IGBH is cheaper at 0.16% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGBH has performed better with a 5.04% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGBH is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 4.40% for PFIG.

PFIG tracks RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.16% for IGBH.

IGBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIG and IGBH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer