PFIG vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFIG (Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. PFIG is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, PFIG returned 4.83% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. PFIG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

PFIG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIG achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

PFIG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 4.83%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 2.44%

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.19%	7.87%	1.78%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIG and CSHP is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	-0.18

PFIG vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFIG	CSHP
Financial Services	15.2%	0.1%
Industrials	11.1%	-
Healthcare	10.9%	-
Technology	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Energy	5.6%	-
Utilities	4.5%	-
Communication Services	4.4%	-
Real Estate	4.2%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	-

Return for Risk

PFIG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIG

PFIG Risk / Return Rank: 48
PFIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PFIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PFIG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PFIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PFIG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFIG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	11.91	-10.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	31.26	-28.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	7.44	-6.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	65.71	-63.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	432.16	-423.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFIG vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIG and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFIG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	11.91	-10.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	10.75	-10.23

Drawdowns

PFIG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIG drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIG and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFIG	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-0.08%	-15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.94%	-0.06%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	0.00%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-0.00%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	0.01%	+0.58%

Volatility

PFIG vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that PFIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFIG	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.07%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	0.24%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	0.33%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.92%	0.40%	+4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.24%	0.40%	+4.84%

PFIG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFIG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PFIG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

PFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFIG Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.40%	4.15%	4.12%	3.54%	2.58%	3.34%	2.81%	2.92%	2.88%	2.54%	2.58%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFIG and CSHP in my portfolio?

PFIG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFIG or CSHP?

PFIG has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFIG dropped -15.58% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, PFIG or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, PFIG leads with 4.83% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFIG or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, PFIG has performed better with a 4.83% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFIG or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for PFIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFIG or CSHP?

PFIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between PFIG and CSHP?

PFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for PFIG and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.