PFI vs. MMTM
PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - PFI tracks the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFI returned 9.22%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for MMTM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
PFI vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFI achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PFI has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 9.22%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.
PFI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
MMTM
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
PFI vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 7.04% | 1.98% | 30.58% | 12.58% | -24.09% | 28.70% | 13.85% | 36.54% | -17.18% | 15.00% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 5.27% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFI and MMTM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PFI and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PFI vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFI
MMTM
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PFI
MMTM
Real Estate
PFI
MMTM
Basic Materials
PFI
-
MMTM
Communication Services
PFI
-
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
PFI
-
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
PFI
-
MMTM
Energy
PFI
-
MMTM
Healthcare
PFI
-
MMTM
Industrials
PFI
-
MMTM
Technology
PFI
-
MMTM
Utilities
PFI
-
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFI vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
PFI
MMTM
PFI vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFI | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.93 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.65 | 8.42 | -5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFI vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFI drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFI and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFI | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.53% | -33.85% | -25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -9.89% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.82% | -22.08% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | -23.72% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.09% | -33.85% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -4.99% | +3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -4.19% | -10.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 2.26% | +2.36% |
Volatility
PFI vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFI | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.15% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 10.97% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 14.57% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 18.26% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 18.66% | +3.60% |
PFI vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFI vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
PFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than MMTM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 1.00% | 0.68% | 2.77% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 1.28% | 1.56% | 0.92% | 1.98% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFI and MMTM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMTM has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to PFI (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFI dropped -59.53% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 14.83% vs 9.22% for PFI. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PFI has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PFI.
PFI has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.88% for MMTM.
PFI tracks Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PFI and 0.12% for MMTM.
MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFI and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer