PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFL vs. HDLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFL vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFL achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than HDLB's 11.61% return.


PFFL

1D
1.07%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.48%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
-5.70%
10Y*

HDLB

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.25%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFL vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFFL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN
1.10%2.18%4.77%8.65%-39.15%7.52%-15.47%0.95%
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
11.61%27.26%28.21%-4.12%-11.46%62.67%-50.94%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFL and HDLB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2019

0.40

The correlation between PFFL and HDLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFL vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFL
PFFL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFL vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFLHDLBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.77

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

1.23

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.36

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.05

3.01

-0.95

PFFL vs. HDLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the HDLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFL and HDLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFLHDLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.77

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.39

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.10

-0.17

Drawdowns

PFFL vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFL drawdown since its inception was -80.68%, roughly equal to the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFL and HDLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFLHDLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.68%

-78.70%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-14.50%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

-22.46%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.51%

-43.81%

-4.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.72%

-12.64%

-25.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.53%

-27.48%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

6.56%

-1.74%

Volatility

PFFL vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL) is 3.73%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that PFFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFLHDLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

6.36%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

18.10%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

26.40%

-9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

30.54%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.36%

43.59%

+11.77%

PFFL vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFL vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison

PFFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, more than HDLB's 11.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
11.92%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%0.00%
PFFL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN
12.31%13.27%13.76%13.71%13.90%8.82%9.75%11.21%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFL and HDLB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDLB has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to PFFL (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFL dropped -80.68% vs HDLB's -78.70%.

On 5-year performance, HDLB leads with 11.80% vs -5.70% for PFFL. On fees, PFFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, PFFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDLB has performed better with a 11.80% return vs -5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.

PFFL has the higher dividend yield at 12.31%, compared with 11.92% for HDLB.

PFFL is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. PFFL tracks Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PFFL and 1.65% for HDLB.

HDLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFL and HDLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer