PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFD vs. SJNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFD vs. SJNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than SJNK's 1.41% return.


PFFD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.67%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

SJNK

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
5.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFD vs. SJNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
2.29%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%5.07%8.90%17.43%-3.94%0.85%
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
1.41%7.68%8.24%11.63%-5.50%5.06%5.82%9.49%-0.27%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFD and SJNK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.59

The correlation between PFFD and SJNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFFD vs. SJNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFFD
SJNK

Financial Services

59.1%

-

Utilities

15.3%

-

Technology

6.3%

-

Industrials

5.4%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
100.0%

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

PFFD
59.1%
SJNK

-

Utilities

PFFD
15.3%
SJNK

-

Technology

PFFD
6.3%
SJNK

-

Industrials

PFFD
5.4%
SJNK

-

Communication Services

PFFD
4.4%
SJNK
100.0%

Real Estate

PFFD
4.0%
SJNK

-

Basic Materials

PFFD
3.0%
SJNK

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFFD
1.6%
SJNK

-

Healthcare

PFFD
0.8%
SJNK

-

Consumer Defensive

PFFD

-

SJNK

-

Energy

PFFD

-

SJNK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFD vs. SJNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SJNK
SJNK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SJNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SJNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJNK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFD vs. SJNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFDSJNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.74

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

16.21

-12.40

PFFD vs. SJNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the SJNK Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFD and SJNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFDSJNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.02

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.83

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.80

-0.59

Drawdowns

PFFD vs. SJNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than SJNK's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and SJNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFDSJNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-19.74%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-1.73%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-4.77%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-10.18%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-0.19%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-1.63%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.40%

+1.61%

Volatility

PFFD vs. SJNK - Volatility Comparison

Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) at 0.91%. This indicates that PFFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFDSJNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

0.91%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

2.45%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.19%

3.20%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

5.83%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

6.49%

+6.27%

PFFD vs. SJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SJNK's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFD vs. SJNK - Dividend Comparison

PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than SJNK's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.37%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%0.00%0.00%
SJNK
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.02%7.12%7.47%7.20%5.85%4.21%5.34%5.64%5.69%5.64%5.65%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFD and SJNK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFD has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to SJNK (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs SJNK's -19.74%.

On 5-year performance, SJNK leads with 4.84% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, SJNK has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SJNK has performed better with a 4.84% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.

SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 6.37% for PFFD.

PFFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SJNK is High Yield Bonds. PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while SJNK tracks Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.40% for SJNK.

SJNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFD and SJNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer