PFFD vs. PFXF
PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) and PFXF (VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PFFD tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index while PFXF tracks the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFD returned -0.16%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for PFXF. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for PFXF.
Performance
PFFD vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 8.54% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
PFFD vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 8.54% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 11.20% | -18.83% | 11.61% | 7.61% | 20.52% | -4.17% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and PFXF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PFFD and PFXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PFFD vs. PFXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFD
PFXF
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
PFFD
PFXF
Utilities
PFFD
PFXF
Technology
PFFD
PFXF
Industrials
PFFD
PFXF
Communication Services
PFFD
PFXF
Real Estate
PFFD
PFXF
Basic Materials
PFFD
PFXF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFFD
PFXF
Healthcare
PFFD
PFXF
Consumer Defensive
PFFD
-
PFXF
Energy
PFFD
-
PFXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
PFXF
PFFD vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.15 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 11.08 | -7.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.06 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.41 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.49 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and PFXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -35.49% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -5.83% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | -11.90% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -21.80% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.95% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -3.91% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.65% | +0.36% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.09%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 3.14% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 6.89% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 8.94% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 10.91% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 13.21% | -0.45% |
PFFD vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFD vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than PFXF's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.08% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFD and PFXF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFXF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs PFXF's -35.49%.
On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.48% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.48% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 6.08% for PFXF.
PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.41% for PFXF.
PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFD and PFXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer