PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFD vs. PERF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFD vs. PERF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and Perfect Corp. (PERF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than PERF's -8.29% return.


PFFD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.67%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

PERF

1D
-2.92%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-8.29%
6M
-9.29%
1Y
-7.78%
3Y*
-31.21%
5Y*
-29.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFD vs. PERF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
2.29%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%7.59%
PERF
Perfect Corp.
-8.29%-36.04%-8.71%-56.58%-27.51%-2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFD and PERF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2021

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFD vs. PERF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PERF
PERF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PERF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PERF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PERF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PERF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PERF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFD vs. PERF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and Perfect Corp. (PERF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFDPERFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

-0.16

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

-0.25

+4.06

PFFD vs. PERF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the PERF Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFD and PERF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFDPERFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

-0.13

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.42

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.42

+0.63

Drawdowns

PFFD vs. PERF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum PERF drawdown of -88.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and PERF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFDPERFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-88.17%

+57.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-50.38%

+44.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-74.31%

+63.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-88.17%

+63.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-84.90%

+81.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-50.41%

+43.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

31.01%

-29.00%

Volatility

PFFD vs. PERF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.09%, while Perfect Corp. (PERF) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PERF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFDPERFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

7.33%

-5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

41.75%

-36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.19%

60.69%

-53.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

71.06%

-60.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

69.28%

-56.52%

Dividends

PFFD vs. PERF - Dividend Comparison

PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, while PERF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PERF
Perfect Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.37%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFD and PERF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PERF has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs PERF's -88.17%.

PFFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFD and PERF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer