PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFA vs. CPXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund, Inc. (CPXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than CPXIX's 1.66% return.


PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*

CPXIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.30%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%
CPXIX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund, Inc.
1.66%8.44%10.39%6.38%-12.37%2.75%6.47%18.11%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFA and CPXIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.62

The correlation between PFFA and CPXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFA vs. CPXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CPXIX
CPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund, Inc. (CPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFACPXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.85

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.81

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

12.82

-5.03

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFA Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the CPXIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFA and CPXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFACPXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.44

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.17

-0.93

Drawdowns

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than CPXIX's maximum drawdown of -25.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and CPXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFACPXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-25.56%

-44.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-3.00%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-3.91%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-20.00%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.01%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-2.69%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.65%

+1.25%

Volatility

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund, Inc. (CPXIX) at 0.80%. This indicates that PFFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFACPXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

0.80%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

2.09%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

2.45%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

4.70%

+6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

6.16%

+25.68%

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CPXIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFA vs. CPXIX - Dividend Comparison

PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than CPXIX's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPXIX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund, Inc.
5.78%5.54%5.52%5.76%5.40%4.89%5.17%5.30%5.88%5.01%5.75%5.91%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFA and CPXIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to CPXIX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs CPXIX's -25.56%.

CPXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFA and CPXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer