PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFA vs. AGNCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than AGNCN's 4.16% return.


PFFA

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.42%
6M
4.32%
1Y
14.72%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

AGNCN

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
4.16%
6M
5.60%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.42%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%
AGNCN
AGNC Investment Corp.
4.16%7.77%15.21%9.13%6.33%7.91%6.01%9.80%3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFA and AGNCN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFA vs. AGNCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNCN
AGNCN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AGNCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNCN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNCN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFAAGNCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.90

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

15.04

-7.29

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFA Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the AGNCN Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFA and AGNCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFAAGNCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.06

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.98

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.39

-0.15

Drawdowns

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than AGNCN's maximum drawdown of -53.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and AGNCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFAAGNCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-53.34%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-2.67%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-7.17%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-13.62%

-9.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.69%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-2.24%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.69%

+1.21%

Volatility

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Volatility Comparison

Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN) at 1.05%. This indicates that PFFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFAAGNCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

1.05%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.69%

3.19%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.03%

5.07%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

9.51%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

22.94%

+8.90%

Dividends

PFFA vs. AGNCN - Dividend Comparison

PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than AGNCN's 9.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGNCN
AGNC Investment Corp.
9.27%9.60%10.37%10.57%7.47%6.81%6.87%6.74%6.92%2.70%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.59%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFA and AGNCN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to AGNCN (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs AGNCN's -53.34%.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFA and AGNCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer