PFEB vs. RPXIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PFEB (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February) and RPXIX (RiverPark Large Growth Fund) are both funds - PFEB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while RPXIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by RiverPark Funds. Over the past 5 years, PFEB returned 8.69%/yr vs -0.18%/yr for RPXIX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for RPXIX.

Performance

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFEB achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than RPXIX's -0.24% return.

PFEB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: —

RPXIX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.58%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: -0.18%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	5.50%	10.65%	12.71%	14.96%	-2.84%	11.52%	6.07%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	-0.24%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	48.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PFEB and RPXIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020	0.79

The correlation between PFEB and RPXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PFEB vs. RPXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFEB

PFEB Risk / Return Rank: 82
PFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFEB	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	0.74	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	1.10	+2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.14	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	0.72	+2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.18	2.41	+14.77

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the RPXIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFEB and RPXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFEB drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum RPXIX drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFEB and RPXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFEB	RPXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-58.56%	+38.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-15.28%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.58%	-21.93%	+11.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.05%	-58.56%	+47.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-8.10%	+7.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-11.61%	+9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	4.56%	-3.66%

Volatility

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is 1.79%, while RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that PFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFEB	RPXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	5.30%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.83%	11.84%	-7.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.07%	14.81%	-8.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.26%	26.32%	-18.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.29%	24.76%	-13.47%

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RPXIX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFEB vs. RPXIX - Dividend Comparison

PFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	9.17%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFEB and RPXIX in my portfolio?

PFEB and RPXIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFEB or RPXIX?

RPXIX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to PFEB (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFEB dropped -19.98% vs RPXIX's -58.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.