PFEB vs. FFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY).
PFEB and FFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFEB is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Jan 31, 2020. FFTY is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD 50 Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. Both PFEB and FFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PFEB vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFEB vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February | -1.52% | 10.65% | 12.71% | 14.96% | -2.84% | 11.52% | 6.24% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | -4.02% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 14.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFEB achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's -4.02% return.
PFEB
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- -18.29%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -9.38%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFEB vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFEB vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
PFEB
FFTY
PFEB vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFEB | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.74 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.14 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.04 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 3.05 | +5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFEB | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.74 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | -0.16 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.12 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFEB and FFTY is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFEB vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
PFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.40% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
PFEB vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFEB drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFEB and FFTY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFEB | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.98% | -59.46% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | -23.29% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.05% | -59.46% | +48.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -32.35% | +29.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -22.38% | +20.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 7.97% | -6.62% |
Volatility
PFEB vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is 3.15%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that PFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFEB | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 14.46% | -11.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 28.72% | -24.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 34.49% | -24.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.22% | 29.00% | -20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 27.17% | -15.73% |