PFDE vs. NRSH
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PFDE is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
PFDE vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFDE
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- -4.97%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 39.61%
- 6M
- 36.75%
- 1Y
- 51.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFDE vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 9.27% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 39.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and NRSH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
NRSH
PFDE vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFDE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.96 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -24.01% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -5.62% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -5.61% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 24.97% | -8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 21.75% | -5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 21.75% | -5.45% |
PFDE vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than NRSH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.30% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and NRSH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFDE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFDE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.11% for PFDE.
They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.75% for NRSH.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer