PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFDE vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFDE vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.70% return.


PFDE

1D
0.56%
1M
2.90%
6M
11.47%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAY

1D
0.26%
1M
1.23%
6M
4.19%
YTD
4.70%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFDE vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFDE and DMAY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFDE vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFDE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFDE vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFDEDMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

PFDE vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFDE vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFDEDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-13.90%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.03%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-2.22%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

Volatility

PFDE vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFDEDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

5.24%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

9.09%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

8.42%

+7.99%

PFDE vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFDE vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PFDE and DMAY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PFDE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PFDE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

PFDE has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.85% for DMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFDE and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer