PFDE vs. DMAY
PFDE (Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - PFDE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while DMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. PFDE is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFDE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
PFDE vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFDE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.70% return.
PFDE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PFDE vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 13.09% | -0.91% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.70% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFDE and DMAY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFDE vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
PFDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DMAY
PFDE vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF (PFDE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFDE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFDE vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFDE drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFDE and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFDE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -13.90% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.03% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -2.22% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility
PFDE vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFDE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 5.24% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 9.09% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 8.42% | +7.99% |
PFDE vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFDE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFDE vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
PFDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% |
PFDE Pathfinder Disciplined U.S. Equity ETF | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFDE and DMAY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFDE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFDE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
PFDE has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
PFDE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFDE and 0.85% for DMAY.
Find the right allocation for PFDE and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer