PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in PICTON Long Short Equity (130/30) Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) and PICTON Long Short Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFAE.TO achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than PFIA.TO's 0.91% return.


PFAE.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
1.17%
6M
8.12%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.02%

PFIA.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
6M
0.37%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$123.45KCA$195.19KCA$237.15K
CA$392.29KCA$336.42KCA$327.83K

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFAE.TO
PICTON Long Short Equity (130/30) Alternative Fund
12.75%25.47%28.53%12.08%-7.08%24.90%21.52%5.00%
PFIA.TO
PICTON Long Short Income Alternative Fund
0.91%5.42%7.76%7.26%-3.42%3.17%9.26%3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PFAE.TO and PFIA.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFAE.TO
PFAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PFAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PFAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIA.TO
PFIA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PICTON Long Short Equity (130/30) Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) and PICTON Long Short Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFAE.TOPFIA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.44

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

6.83

+6.26

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFAE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFAE.TO and PFIA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, which is greater than PFIA.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFAE.TO and PFIA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFAE.TOPFIA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.50%

-17.12%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-1.36%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-1.47%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-6.46%

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.34%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-1.11%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

0.48%

+1.70%

Volatility

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Volatility Comparison

PICTON Long Short Equity (130/30) Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to PICTON Long Short Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) at 0.67%. This indicates that PFAE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFIA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFAE.TOPFIA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

0.67%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

1.88%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

2.43%

+12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

4.18%

+12.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

6.35%

+11.79%

Dividends

PFAE.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Dividend Comparison

PFAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than PFIA.TO's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PFAE.TO
PICTON Long Short Equity (130/30) Alternative Fund
0.30%0.34%0.03%0.69%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.95%
PFIA.TO
PICTON Long Short Income Alternative Fund
4.91%3.97%3.66%5.63%4.69%4.25%6.02%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFAE.TO and PFIA.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFAE.TO and PFIA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer