PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFIA.TO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than XCB.TO's 1.75% return.


PFIA.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*

XCB.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.66%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.49%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PFIA.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund
0.42%5.46%7.72%7.27%-3.42%3.17%9.28%3.68%
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.75%4.45%6.72%8.30%-9.79%-1.81%8.36%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PFIA.TO and XCB.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFIA.TO
PFIA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XCB.TO
XCB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFIA.TOXCB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.72

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

5.08

+2.64

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFIA.TO and XCB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFIA.TOXCB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.15

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.41

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.63

+0.12

Drawdowns

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFIA.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.12%, smaller than the maximum XCB.TO drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFIA.TO and XCB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFIA.TOXCB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.12%

-22.59%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.36%

-2.49%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-3.56%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.46%

-14.17%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.10%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-2.12%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.84%

-0.36%

Volatility

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) is 1.15%, while iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that PFIA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFIA.TOXCB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.45%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

2.92%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

3.74%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

5.67%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

7.23%

-0.82%

Dividends

PFIA.TO vs. XCB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PFIA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than XCB.TO's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFIA.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund
4.49%3.96%3.68%5.64%4.69%4.25%6.03%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.13%4.10%4.00%3.69%3.55%3.01%2.75%2.95%3.10%3.07%3.19%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFIA.TO and XCB.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFIA.TO and XCB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer