PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Extension Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO).
PFAE.TO and PFMN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.
Performance
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFAE.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Extension Alternative Fund | 2.45% | 25.47% | 28.53% | 12.08% | -6.88% | 24.90% | 21.52% | 6.33% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | -0.43% | 4.86% | 15.06% | 3.13% | 5.43% | 6.10% | 16.70% | 1.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFAE.TO achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than PFMN.TO's -0.43% return.
PFAE.TO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PFMN.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PFAE.TO
PFMN.TO
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Extension Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFAE.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 0.92 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.40 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.62 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 4.57 | +7.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFAE.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 0.92 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.77 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFAE.TO and PFMN.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Dividend Comparison
PFAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PFMN.TO's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFAE.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Extension Alternative Fund | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.03% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.30% |
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, which is greater than PFMN.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFAE.TO and PFMN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFAE.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.50% | -13.04% | -18.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -3.49% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.77% | -4.24% | -13.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -1.72% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -1.19% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.24% | +1.41% |
Volatility
PFAE.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Extension Alternative Fund (PFAE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) at 1.95%. This indicates that PFAE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFMN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFAE.TO | PFMN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 1.95% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 3.24% | +8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 5.74% | +11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 8.01% | +10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 9.86% | +12.98% |