PEZ vs. XMMO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PEZ tracks the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index while XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEZ returned 9.60%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for XMMO. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

PEZ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 13.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 9.60%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.17% annualized return.

PEZ

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: -0.74%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 1Y: 6.66%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 9.60%
• ALL TIME*: 7.97%

XMMO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: 10.87%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 24.75%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: 18.17%
• ALL TIME*: 12.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	$60.19K	$110.69K	$64.89K
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	$60.28M	$71.43M	$67.26M

PEZ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	0.24%	5.40%	20.06%	29.55%	-29.59%	20.35%	38.97%	18.05%	-6.85%	19.87%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	13.32%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and XMMO is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.77

The correlation between PEZ and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEZ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEZ	XMMO
Consumer Cyclical	70.1%	5.0%
Communication Services	11.7%	1.7%
Healthcare	7.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	0.5%
Technology	3.7%	12.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	7.2%
Industrials	1.0%	37.0%
Financial Services	0.6%	2.9%
Basic Materials	-	10.2%
Energy	-	8.4%
Utilities	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

PEZ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEZ

PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 18
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 44
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEZ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEZ	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	1.04	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.53	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.19	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	1.60	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	6.64	-5.64

PEZ vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEZ	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.39%	-55.37%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.83%	-13.91%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	-24.93%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.72%	-27.91%	-13.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.05%	-36.74%	-15.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-10.02%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-9.42%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.66%	3.35%	+3.31%

Volatility

PEZ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.52%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEZ	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	7.91%	-3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	18.48%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.12%	21.51%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.16%	21.87%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.07%	22.44%	+2.63%

PEZ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEZ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than XMMO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	0.24%	0.11%	0.12%	0.60%	0.43%	0.23%	0.39%	0.01%	0.40%	0.42%	0.83%	0.64%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.62%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEZ and XMMO in my portfolio?

PEZ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEZ or XMMO?

XMMO has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to PEZ (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, PEZ or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.17% vs 9.60% for PEZ. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEZ or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEZ or XMMO?

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEZ or XMMO?

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.

What is the main difference between PEZ and XMMO?

PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.