PEZ vs. ONEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) are both Momentum funds - PEZ tracks the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index while ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEZ returned 9.46%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for ONEO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ONEO.

Performance

PEZ vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than ONEO's 17.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed ONEO with an annualized return of 9.46%, while ONEO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.

PEZ

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: -4.23%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

ONEO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 18.38%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	-4.23%	5.40%	20.06%	29.55%	-29.59%	20.35%	38.97%	18.05%	-6.85%	19.87%
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.85%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and ONEO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015	0.77

The correlation between PEZ and ONEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEZ vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEZ	ONEO
Consumer Cyclical	66.0%	11.6%
Communication Services	11.9%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	5.4%
Healthcare	6.9%	9.5%
Technology	4.0%	21.9%
Industrials	3.8%	18.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.9%
Financial Services	0.6%	9.4%
Basic Materials	-	4.7%
Energy	-	7.3%
Utilities	-	5.8%

Return for Risk

PEZ vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ

PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 13
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 69
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEZ	ONEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	2.16	-1.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	3.09	-2.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.38	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	3.75	-3.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.91	14.86	-13.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEZ vs. ONEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the ONEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and ONEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEZ	ONEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	2.16	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.61	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.64	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.63	-0.31

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than ONEO's maximum drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and ONEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEZ	ONEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.39%	-40.86%	-17.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.83%	-7.37%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	-19.72%	-11.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.72%	-22.39%	-19.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.05%	-40.86%	-11.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.25%	0.00%	-11.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	-5.00%	-8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	1.86%	+4.10%

Volatility

PEZ vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) at 3.77%. This indicates that PEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEZ	ONEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	3.77%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.13%	9.66%	+5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.07%	12.84%	+7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.48%	17.22%	+7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.06%	18.66%	+6.40%

PEZ vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEZ vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ONEO's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	0.22%	0.11%	0.12%	0.60%	0.43%	0.23%	0.39%	0.01%	0.40%	0.42%	0.83%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEZ and ONEO in my portfolio?

PEZ and ONEO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEZ or ONEO?

PEZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to ONEO (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs ONEO's -40.86%.

Which ETF is better, PEZ or ONEO?

On 10-year performance, ONEO leads with 11.94% vs 9.46% for PEZ. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEZ or ONEO?

Over the 10-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEZ or ONEO?

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEZ or ONEO?

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

What is the main difference between PEZ and ONEO?

PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.20% for ONEO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.