PEY vs. XLG
PEY (Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEY returned 8.50%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for XLG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEY charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
PEY vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEY achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PEY has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 8.50%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.
PEY
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
XLG
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
PEY vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 11.81% | 0.56% | 5.25% | 7.29% | 2.45% | 26.15% | -3.85% | 24.76% | -7.49% | 8.78% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 7.57% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEY and XLG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2005 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PEY and XLG has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PEY vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEY
XLG
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
PEY
XLG
Consumer Defensive
PEY
XLG
Industrials
PEY
XLG
Utilities
PEY
XLG
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEY
XLG
Healthcare
PEY
XLG
Technology
PEY
XLG
Basic Materials
PEY
XLG
Communication Services
PEY
XLG
Energy
PEY
XLG
Real Estate
PEY
-
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEY vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
PEY
XLG
PEY vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.31 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 8.66 | -3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.15 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.87 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.92 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.62 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
PEY vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEY drawdown since its inception was -72.81%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEY and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.81% | -52.39% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -12.41% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -20.70% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | -28.02% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.55% | -30.46% | -11.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.44% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -7.64% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.30% | -0.13% |
Volatility
PEY vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that PEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 3.19% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 9.80% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 13.33% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 18.68% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 18.84% | +0.06% |
PEY vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEY has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEY vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
PEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 4.52% | 4.85% | 4.44% | 4.58% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.21% | 3.12% | 3.44% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEY and XLG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEY has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEY dropped -72.81% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 8.50% for PEY. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.
PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.
PEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for PEY and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEY and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer