PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEY vs. AUSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEY vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEY achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.


PEY

1D
-1.52%
1M
2.48%
YTD
11.81%
6M
11.63%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
8.50%

AUSF

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.67%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEY vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
11.81%0.56%5.25%7.29%2.45%26.15%-3.85%24.76%-10.89%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
6.72%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PEY and AUSF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.85

The correlation between PEY and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEY vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEY
AUSF

Financial Services

21.7%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

16.9%
8.5%

Industrials

15.0%
11.7%

Utilities

12.0%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.8%

Healthcare

6.8%
12.0%

Technology

6.5%
13.5%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
10.6%

Energy

1.5%
5.2%

Real Estate

-

4.1%

Financial Services

PEY
21.7%
AUSF
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

PEY
16.9%
AUSF
8.5%

Industrials

PEY
15.0%
AUSF
11.7%

Utilities

PEY
12.0%
AUSF
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PEY
7.5%
AUSF
7.8%

Healthcare

PEY
6.8%
AUSF
12.0%

Technology

PEY
6.5%
AUSF
13.5%

Basic Materials

PEY
6.4%
AUSF
4.0%

Communication Services

PEY
5.7%
AUSF
10.6%

Energy

PEY
1.5%
AUSF
5.2%

Real Estate

PEY

-

AUSF
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEY vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEY
PEY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEY vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEYAUSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.50

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

2.18

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.60

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.90

7.54

-2.64

PEY vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEY and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEYAUSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.50

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.94

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.65

-0.36

Drawdowns

PEY vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEY drawdown since its inception was -72.81%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEY and AUSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEYAUSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.81%

-44.25%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-5.84%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.90%

-12.29%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-14.23%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.26%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-4.22%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.01%

+1.16%

Volatility

PEY vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that PEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEYAUSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.41%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

6.65%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

10.14%

+3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

13.65%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

19.07%

-0.17%

PEY vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEY has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEY vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

PEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than AUSF's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.76%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
4.52%4.85%4.44%4.58%4.22%3.83%4.30%3.78%4.33%3.21%3.12%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEY and AUSF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEY has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEY dropped -72.81% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 5.57% for PEY. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.

PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 2.76% for AUSF.

PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for PEY and 0.27% for AUSF.

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEY and AUSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer