PEX vs. IYF
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while IYF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.62%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for IYF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYF.
Performance
PEX vs. IYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 4.62%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
IYF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
PEX vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.80% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 0.92% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and IYF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PEX and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
IYF
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
IYF
Industrials
PEX
IYF
-
Healthcare
PEX
IYF
-
Basic Materials
PEX
IYF
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
IYF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
IYF
-
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
IYF
-
Energy
PEX
-
IYF
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
IYF
Technology
PEX
-
IYF
Utilities
PEX
-
IYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
IYF
PEX vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.15 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.86 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 2.32 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and IYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -79.09% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -13.88% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -16.60% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.06% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -42.57% | -6.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.09% | -2.17% | -19.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -17.58% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 5.14% | +7.92% |
Volatility
PEX vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) at 4.13%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.13% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 11.19% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 14.53% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 19.00% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.84% | -1.54% |
PEX vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than IYF's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.01% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and IYF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to IYF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs IYF's -79.09%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.90% vs 4.62% for PEX. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYF is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 1.48% for IYF.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.42% for IYF.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and IYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer