PEX vs. IYF
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while IYF tracks the Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.92%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for IYF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYF.
Performance
PEX vs. IYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 4.92%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
IYF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
PEX vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -7.84% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 5.20% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and IYF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PEX and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
IYF
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
IYF
Industrials
PEX
IYF
-
Healthcare
PEX
IYF
-
Basic Materials
PEX
IYF
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
IYF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
IYF
-
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
IYF
-
Energy
PEX
-
IYF
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
IYF
Technology
PEX
-
IYF
Utilities
PEX
-
IYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
IYF
PEX vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.94 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 2.52 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and IYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -79.09% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -13.88% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -16.60% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.06% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -42.57% | -6.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.70% | 0.00% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -17.54% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 5.16% | +8.77% |
Volatility
PEX vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) have volatilities of 3.97% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.05% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 11.13% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 14.57% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.00% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 20.80% | -1.55% |
PEX vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IYF's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than IYF's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.42% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 8.61% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and IYF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to PEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs IYF's -79.09%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.63% vs 4.92% for PEX. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 1.42% for IYF.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while IYF tracks Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.38% for IYF.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and IYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer