PEX vs. FNCL
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while FNCL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.92%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for FNCL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FNCL.
Performance
PEX vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's 5.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 4.92%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
FNCL
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
PEX vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -7.84% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 5.29% | 14.94% | 30.44% | 14.10% | -12.28% | 34.92% | -2.19% | 31.59% | -13.44% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and FNCL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PEX and FNCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. FNCL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
FNCL
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
FNCL
Industrials
PEX
FNCL
Healthcare
PEX
FNCL
Basic Materials
PEX
FNCL
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
FNCL
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
FNCL
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
FNCL
-
Energy
PEX
-
FNCL
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
FNCL
Technology
PEX
-
FNCL
Utilities
PEX
-
FNCL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
FNCL
PEX vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.15 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.79 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 2.04 | -3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and FNCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -44.38% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -14.78% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -17.29% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.68% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -44.38% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.70% | 0.00% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -6.87% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 5.70% | +8.23% |
Volatility
PEX vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) have volatilities of 3.97% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.98% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 11.28% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 14.89% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.16% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 22.26% | -3.01% |
PEX vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than FNCL's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 8.61% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and FNCL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNCL has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to PEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs FNCL's -44.38%.
On 10-year performance, FNCL leads with 13.34% vs 4.92% for PEX. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNCL has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 1.56% for FNCL.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.08% for FNCL.
FNCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and FNCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer