PEO vs. STK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEO (Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund) and STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - PEO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Adams Funds, while STK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEO returned 10.23%/yr vs 24.60%/yr for STK. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for STK.

Performance

PEO vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEO achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PEO has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 10.23%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.60% annualized return.

PEO

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: 26.23%
• 6M: 25.94%
• 1Y: 40.21%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

STK

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 17.70%
• YTD: 59.80%
• 6M: 57.03%
• 1Y: 116.50%
• 3Y*: 37.51%
• 5Y*: 22.04%
• 10Y*: 24.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEO vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	26.23%	9.98%	13.58%	0.91%	41.77%	53.75%	-26.37%	20.96%	-23.11%	4.65%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	59.80%	24.85%	17.74%	46.60%	-30.36%	48.63%	25.39%	52.73%	-14.91%	33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PEO and STK is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009	0.37

The correlation between PEO and STK shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PEO vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEO

PEO Risk / Return Rank: 63
PEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PEO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PEO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

STK

STK Risk / Return Rank: 98
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 95
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEO vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEO	STK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	5.11	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	5.87	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.80	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	9.12	-4.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.08	38.55	-26.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEO vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEO and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEO	STK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	5.11	-2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.88	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.94	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.76	-0.43

Drawdowns

PEO vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEO drawdown since its inception was -71.88%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEO and STK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEO	STK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.88%	-41.74%	-30.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	-12.84%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-26.59%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.30%	-36.27%	+11.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.74%	-41.74%	-26.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.17%	-0.19%	-4.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.32%	-7.41%	-7.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.03%	+0.31%

Volatility

PEO vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) is 6.69%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that PEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEO	STK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	8.47%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	18.91%	-4.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	22.93%	-5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	25.10%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.32%	26.13%	+1.19%

PEO vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEO vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

PEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than STK's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	7.62%	9.43%	8.14%	6.54%	7.48%	5.51%	6.42%	6.68%	5.63%	5.95%	5.65%	7.78%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	4.72%	7.38%	16.02%	6.70%	12.62%	8.48%	6.79%	7.86%	14.88%	11.82%	9.87%	10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEO and STK in my portfolio?

PEO and STK have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEO or STK?

STK has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to PEO (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEO dropped -71.88% vs STK's -41.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.