PEMX vs. STXE
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. PEMX is actively managed, while STXE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 28.43%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
PEMX vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.45%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $78.06K | $81.41K | $258.35K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
PEMX vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 26.42% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 15.13% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and STXE is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PEMX and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEMX vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEMX
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
PEMX
STXE
Financial Services
PEMX
STXE
Industrials
PEMX
STXE
Communication Services
PEMX
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
PEMX
STXE
Utilities
PEMX
STXE
Basic Materials
PEMX
STXE
Healthcare
PEMX
STXE
Consumer Defensive
PEMX
STXE
Energy
PEMX
STXE
Real Estate
PEMX
-
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
STXE
PEMX vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMX | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.73 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 10.29 | -1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.04%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.04% | -20.38% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.04% | -20.38% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -20.38% | +1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.50% | -14.59% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -3.95% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 5.39% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) is 10.79%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that PEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | 13.05% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.23% | 28.09% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.22% | 29.83% | -2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 20.17% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 20.17% | +0.06% |
PEMX vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than STXE's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 5.54% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PEMX and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to PEMX (10.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -19.04% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 28.43% vs 23.32% for STXE. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, PEMX has been the lower-risk option at 10.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 28.43% return vs 23.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer