PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMX vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 30.56% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 34.42% return.


PEMX

1D
-4.48%
1M
-4.73%
6M
23.98%
YTD
30.56%
1Y
52.11%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
10Y*

STXE

1D
-4.66%
1M
-5.87%
6M
26.56%
YTD
34.42%
1Y
58.13%
3Y*
24.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
30.56%34.01%17.21%15.13%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
34.42%34.23%2.09%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and STXE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.91

The correlation between PEMX and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMXSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.03

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

14.03

-1.43

PEMX vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-18.92%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-14.51%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-18.92%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.70%

-12.68%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-3.78%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

4.16%

-0.01%

Volatility

PEMX vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) is 13.23%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that PEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMXSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.23%

14.44%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

26.40%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.07%

28.09%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

19.56%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

19.56%

+0.31%

PEMX vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMX vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than STXE's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
5.36%7.00%5.00%0.72%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.87%2.66%3.22%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PEMX and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to PEMX (13.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs STXE's -18.92%.

On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 29.12% vs 24.14% for STXE. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, PEMX has been the lower-risk option at 13.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 24.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 1.87% for STXE.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.32% for STXE.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMX and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer