PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. PHYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMX vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 38.87% return, which is significantly higher than PHYD's 2.32% return.


PEMX

1D
-6.08%
1M
6.67%
YTD
38.87%
6M
41.13%
1Y
69.16%
3Y*
33.94%
5Y*
10Y*

PHYD

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.57%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
38.87%34.01%17.21%15.13%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
2.32%8.84%7.35%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and PHYD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYD
PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMXPHYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

3.66

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.22

14.79

+3.43

PEMX vs. PHYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the PHYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and PHYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, which is greater than PHYD's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and PHYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXPHYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-4.33%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-2.10%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-4.14%

-10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-0.79%

-5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-0.62%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

0.52%

+3.29%

Volatility

PEMX vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) at 1.07%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMXPHYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

1.07%

+13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.77%

2.57%

+20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.00%

3.36%

+21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

4.58%

+14.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.49%

4.58%

+14.91%

PEMX vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMX vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than PHYD's 8.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
5.04%7.00%5.00%0.72%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
8.52%6.63%6.80%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEMX and PHYD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEMX has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to PHYD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs PHYD's -4.33%.

On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 33.94% vs 8.72% for PHYD. On fees, PHYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 33.94% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 5.04% for PEMX.

PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while PHYD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.55% for PHYD.

PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMX and PHYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer