PEMX vs. DEM
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. PEMX is actively managed, while DEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 28.43%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for DEM. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
PEMX vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 17.08% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.45%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.90M | $9.48M | $10.87M | |
| $78.06K | $81.41K | $258.35K |
PEMX vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 26.42% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 15.13% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.08% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 12.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and DEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PEMX and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEMX vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEMX
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
PEMX
DEM
Financial Services
PEMX
DEM
Industrials
PEMX
DEM
Communication Services
PEMX
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
PEMX
DEM
Utilities
PEMX
DEM
Basic Materials
PEMX
DEM
Healthcare
PEMX
DEM
Consumer Defensive
PEMX
DEM
Energy
PEMX
DEM
Real Estate
PEMX
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
DEM
PEMX vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.15 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 9.50 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.04%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.04% | -51.85% | +32.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.04% | -7.89% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -15.64% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.50% | -3.57% | -10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -12.82% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 2.61% | +2.66% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.12%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | 5.12% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.23% | 13.28% | +11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.22% | 15.02% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 15.60% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 17.85% | +2.38% |
PEMX vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than DEM's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.18% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 5.54% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMX and DEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEMX has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to DEM (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -19.04% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 28.43% vs 15.88% for DEM. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 28.43% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.18% for DEM.
PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.63% for DEM.
PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer