PELBX vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PELBX (PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both funds - PELBX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 3 years, PELBX returned 9.06%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for PYLD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PELBX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

PELBX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's 1.71% return.

PELBX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 10.20%
• 3Y*: 9.06%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 4.44%

PYLD

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: 8.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PELBX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund	0.47%	22.96%	-0.75%	5.25%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.71%	9.57%	7.69%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PELBX and PYLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.47

The correlation between PELBX and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PELBX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PELBX

PELBX Risk / Return Rank: 31
PELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 71
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PELBX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PELBX	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.19	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.20	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.43	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	2.07	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	9.39	-4.67

PELBX vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELBX and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PELBX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PELBX	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.17%	-4.52%	-31.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	-3.25%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.49%	-4.52%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	0.00%	-3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	-0.64%	-10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	0.72%	+1.49%

Volatility

PELBX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.04%. This indicates that PELBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PELBX	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	1.04%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	2.63%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.38%	3.07%	+4.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.08%	3.98%	+4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.84%	3.98%	+4.86%

PELBX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

PELBX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than PYLD's 6.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund	7.13%	6.71%	7.08%	4.81%	3.24%	4.87%	4.87%	6.14%	6.88%	5.84%	5.69%	5.51%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.25%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PELBX and PYLD in my portfolio?

PELBX and PYLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PELBX or PYLD?

PELBX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to PYLD (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELBX dropped -36.17% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.