PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PELBX vs. PSLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than PSLDX's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PELBX has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.


PELBX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.87%
YTD
1.60%
6M
2.99%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.59%

PSLDX

1D
0.32%
1M
7.19%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.08%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
1.60%22.96%-0.75%15.11%-7.36%-8.13%2.16%17.23%-7.49%15.44%
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
10.35%20.34%15.41%27.93%-43.18%25.85%37.80%60.43%-9.31%33.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PELBX and PSLDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.44

The correlation between PELBX and PSLDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (10 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PELBX vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PELBX
PELBX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLDX
PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PELBXPSLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.53

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

10.23

-4.07

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the PSLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELBX and PSLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PELBXPSLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.12

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.27

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.69

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Drawdowns

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum PSLDX drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and PSLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PELBXPSLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-55.25%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-13.70%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.49%

-24.03%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-49.32%

+26.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.89%

-49.32%

+24.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

0.00%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-10.65%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

3.38%

-1.27%

Volatility

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) is 2.41%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that PELBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PELBXPSLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

5.37%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

13.18%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.13%

16.34%

-9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.05%

22.71%

-14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.92%

21.32%

-12.40%

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PELBX vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison

PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than PSLDX's 9.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
7.05%6.71%7.08%4.81%3.24%4.87%4.87%6.14%6.88%5.84%5.69%5.51%
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
9.43%12.92%15.23%3.67%2.66%38.80%12.89%18.91%15.58%24.52%11.55%12.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PELBX and PSLDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLDX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to PELBX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELBX dropped -36.17% vs PSLDX's -55.25%.

PSLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PELBX and PSLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer