PELBX vs. DLENX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX).
PELBX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. DLENX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
PELBX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PELBX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund | -2.30% | 22.96% | -0.75% | 15.11% | -7.36% | -8.13% | 2.16% | 17.23% | -7.49% | 15.44% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | -0.69% | 8.11% | 7.92% | 9.36% | -15.50% | 1.71% | 4.66% | 11.71% | -3.54% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than DLENX's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PELBX has outperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 4.13%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.82% annualized return.
PELBX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
DLENX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PELBX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PELBX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank
PELBX
DLENX
PELBX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PELBX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 1.74 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 2.19 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.70 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 7.21 | +1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PELBX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.74 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.36 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.82 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.93 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between PELBX and DLENX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PELBX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison
PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than DLENX's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund | 6.51% | 6.71% | 7.08% | 4.81% | 3.24% | 4.87% | 4.87% | 6.14% | 6.88% | 5.84% | 5.69% | 5.51% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | 5.35% | 5.33% | 5.71% | 5.29% | 4.49% | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 4.29% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
PELBX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than DLENX's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and DLENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PELBX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -25.64% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -2.44% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | -25.64% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.89% | -25.64% | +0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | -1.49% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -3.65% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 0.65% | +1.02% |
Volatility
PELBX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PELBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PELBX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 0.71% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.98% | 1.38% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 2.59% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 4.56% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 4.66% | +4.29% |