PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLENX vs. PEBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than PEBIX's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has underperformed PEBIX with an annualized return of 3.61%, while PEBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.63% annualized return.


DLENX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.12%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.61%

PEBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.55%
6M
3.23%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.16%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
2.55%15.48%7.83%11.48%-17.48%-2.00%6.56%14.91%-4.17%10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DLENX and PEBIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.70

The correlation between DLENX and PEBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLENX vs. PEBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PEBIX
PEBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PEBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PEBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLENXPEBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

3.12

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.86

5.16

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.64

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.67

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.77

15.80

-2.03

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLENX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the PEBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLENX and PEBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLENXPEBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

3.12

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.89

+0.06

Drawdowns

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum PEBIX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and PEBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLENXPEBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-35.49%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.83%

-4.23%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-6.31%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-28.10%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.64%

-28.10%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.69%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.98%

-0.52%

Volatility

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.68%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLENXPEBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

1.72%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

3.78%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

4.68%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.36%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

6.38%

-1.72%

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PEBIX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLENX vs. PEBIX - Dividend Comparison

DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, less than PEBIX's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.32%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.44%6.68%6.81%5.36%6.21%4.41%4.23%4.47%4.41%5.10%5.57%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLENX and PEBIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEBIX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to DLENX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLENX dropped -25.64% vs PEBIX's -35.49%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLENX and PEBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer