PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEAFX vs. NFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PEAFX having a 18.16% return and NFFFX slightly lower at 17.55%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PEAFX having a 11.41% annualized return and NFFFX not far behind at 11.32%.


PEAFX

1D
0.82%
1M
2.95%
YTD
18.16%
6M
14.06%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
11.41%

NFFFX

1D
0.70%
1M
6.75%
YTD
17.55%
6M
19.27%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEAFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A
18.16%20.25%1.14%22.28%-10.71%15.47%6.43%13.30%-12.77%28.91%
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
17.55%28.52%6.78%16.11%-21.86%4.98%25.17%27.89%-12.08%32.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PEAFX and NFFFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.81

The correlation between PEAFX and NFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEAFX vs. NFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEAFX
PEAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PEAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PEAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NFFFX
NFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEAFXNFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.84

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

11.66

-1.00

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the NFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEAFX and NFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEAFXNFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.51

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.47

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.70

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.40

+0.31

Drawdowns

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, smaller than the maximum NFFFX drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and NFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEAFXNFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.18%

-50.17%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-13.01%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-15.05%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.57%

-33.48%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.18%

-33.48%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-9.81%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.16%

-0.19%

Volatility

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) is 4.63%, while American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that PEAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEAFXNFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

5.50%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

12.51%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

14.73%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

15.42%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

16.14%

+0.99%

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than NFFFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEAFX vs. NFFFX - Dividend Comparison

PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than NFFFX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFFFX
American Funds New World Fund
5.11%6.01%4.01%2.78%1.21%7.23%0.35%3.95%2.62%2.17%1.28%0.94%
PEAFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A
2.52%2.97%1.01%4.01%11.33%9.19%7.05%2.48%11.05%8.07%2.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEAFX and NFFFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFFFX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to PEAFX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEAFX dropped -47.18% vs NFFFX's -50.17%.

NFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEAFX and NFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer