PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEAFX vs. FHKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly lower than FHKFX's 20.27% return.


PEAFX

1D
2.23%
1M
2.64%
6M
1.34%
YTD
11.38%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
11.46%

FHKFX

1D
4.05%
1M
-3.49%
6M
8.95%
YTD
20.27%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PEAFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A
11.38%20.25%1.14%22.28%-10.71%15.47%6.43%13.30%-6.61%
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
20.27%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PEAFX and FHKFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.82

The correlation between PEAFX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEAFX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEAFX
PEAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PEAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PEAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEAFXFHKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.67

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

8.71

-4.59

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the FHKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEAFX and FHKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKFX drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and FHKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEAFXFHKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.18%

-45.47%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-14.49%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-16.71%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

-39.01%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-11.03%

+5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-17.01%

+6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

4.43%

-0.54%

Volatility

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) is 5.08%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that PEAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEAFXFHKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

9.54%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

21.41%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

23.69%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

19.95%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

20.18%

-3.13%

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEAFX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison

PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than FHKFX's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.98%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%0.00%
PEAFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A
2.67%2.97%1.01%4.01%11.33%9.19%7.05%2.48%11.05%8.07%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEAFX and FHKFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKFX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to PEAFX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEAFX dropped -47.18% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEAFX and FHKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer