NFFFX vs. EEMV
NFFFX (American Funds New World Fund) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NFFFX returned 10.27%/yr vs 5.71%/yr for EEMV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NFFFX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFFFX achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NFFFX has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 10.27%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.71% annualized return.
NFFFX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.60%
EEMV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.28M | $14.89M | $17.73M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFFFX American Funds New World Fund | 11.79% | 28.52% | 6.78% | 16.11% | -21.86% | 4.98% | 25.17% | 27.89% | -12.08% | 32.92% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 12.46% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFFFX and EEMV is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NFFFX and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFFFX vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
NFFFX
EEMV
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.90 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 5.72 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFFFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFFFX and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.17% | -31.56% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -9.50% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.05% | -12.47% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | -21.90% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.48% | -31.56% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -7.20% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -7.94% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 3.16% | +0.42% |
Volatility
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 6.49%. This indicates that NFFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 6.49% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.90% | 15.49% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 16.51% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 12.61% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 14.06% | +2.26% |
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFFFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
NFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than EEMV's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
NFFFX American Funds New World Fund | 5.37% | 6.01% | 4.01% | 2.78% | 1.21% | 7.23% | 0.35% | 3.95% | 2.62% | 2.17% | 1.28% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFFFX and EEMV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFFFX has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to EEMV (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFFFX dropped -50.17% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
NFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFFFX and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer