NFFFX vs. EEMV
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV).
NFFFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jun 17, 1999. EEMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011.
Performance
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFFFX American Funds New World Fund | -4.01% | 28.52% | 6.78% | 16.11% | -21.86% | 4.98% | 25.17% | 27.89% | -12.08% | 32.92% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.08% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFFFX achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, NFFFX has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 9.36%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.
NFFFX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -11.95%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFFFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NFFFX vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
NFFFX
EEMV
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.09 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.52 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.52 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 5.82 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.09 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.37 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.32 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between NFFFX and EEMV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
NFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than EEMV's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFFFX American Funds New World Fund | 6.26% | 6.01% | 4.01% | 2.78% | 1.21% | 7.23% | 0.35% | 3.95% | 2.62% | 2.17% | 1.28% | 0.94% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.62% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
Drawdowns
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFFFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFFFX and EEMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.17% | -31.56% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -9.22% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | -21.97% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.48% | -31.56% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.01% | -6.88% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -8.05% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.41% | +0.65% |
Volatility
NFFFX vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund (NFFFX) is 6.38%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that NFFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NFFFX | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 7.36% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 9.48% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 12.91% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 11.48% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 13.74% | +2.22% |